In the past 30 years, the team s first core has not won the FMVP, with Curry leading the way!

From 1995, the team's boss has not won the FMVP in 30 years, including Duncan, Garnett, Curry, and Tatum. Those who won FMVPs for more than two championships are Jordan, James, and Olajuwon.

The first is Curry, who was taken away by FMVP three times, which is very contradictory. You say he is the boss of the team, but his FMVP was taken away. You say he is not, but the Warriors are obviously his team. But these three FMVPs are a bit outrageous. First Iguodala, then Durant, all of them were overwhelming. It is said that Durant is the second, but no matter whether it is data or performance on the field, he does not have to be bigger than Curry at all. Everyone needs to understand one thing: If the second child is as powerful as the eldest, then will the eldest child still be the eldest?

If you really want to calculate, you can only be considered a dual-core, and there is no difference between a boss and a second. For example, Jabbar and the Magician, they are both top five superstars in history, and they are in the same situation as Durant and Curry ranked 10-15. Then if Durant is not the second, then Curry doesn't care about the boss. He is not like Jordan Pippen, who is clearly distinguished. Whether it is the team status or data honors, Jordan is the boss.

Even Iguodala's time was Curry's own problem. He made 5 of 23 shots in the finals, with a shooting percentage of 21.7, and he averaged more than 20 shots per game, averaging 10 three-point shots per game. Such shooting frequency and shooting percentage are also important factors for Curry not to win the FMVP. Iguodala averaged only nearly 11 shots per game, and the most spanning game was also more than 45%. Although Durant made many moves in 2017 and 2018, his shooting percentage was so high, which also involved an issue of efficiency.

followed by Duncan. Parker won the FMVP in 2007 because Duncan's performance was not good enough. Let's first look at Parker's scores in the four finals, 24, 17, 30, 27, and then look at Duncan's data, 12, 14, 23, 24. The boss of a team averages less than 20 points per game, which is obviously not enough. Not to mention that in the finals, any blue-collar starting center can achieve more than 10 rebounds. In the 14th season, Duncan's five finals were 14, 10, 14, 18, and 21 respectively in the five finals, and Leonard 22, 20, 29, 9, and 9. Whether it is the average score or the influence of the game, Leonard has surpassed Duncan. At that time, the Spurs won one win and one loss in the first two games, and Leonard had 20+ in three consecutive games, which was the most important force for the Spurs to win the finals.

The second is Garnett. Logically, the boss of the three Celtic giants at that time should be Garnett, which can be seen from the number of shots. He has the same problem as Duncan. His data and performance are not as explosive as others, and his hit rate can be as low as 29%, and his shots are more than others.

Finally it is Tatum. It makes sense for fans to call him Titum. His shooting percentage is indeed not as good as Brown. The FMVP selection obviously requires better standards.

Although the criteria for FMVP selection have always been elusive, scoring and hit rate should be the most critical factor. In addition, only the winning points are considered, rather than the average all scores. Only if you win, you can have FMVP. Even if the core of the finals scores 50 points, it cannot change the end of the loss. Take Iguodala as an example. If you only refer to the winning game, G6-G1 is 25 (20 shots), 14 (11 shots), 22 (15 shots), and 15 (8 shots), with shooting percentages of 45%, 46%, 53%, and 75%, respectively. Curry has 25 (19 shots), 37 (23 shots), 22 (17 shots), 26 (20 shots), and his shooting percentage is 42%, 56%, 47%, and 50%. In fact, the result is obvious.

Speaking of hit rate, someone wants to give an example when Kobe won two consecutive championships, but in four wins that year, Gasol's four wins were 14, 16, 24, and 16 respectively, and in 10 years it was 19, 17, 13, and 23. His contribution to scoring was not as good as Iguodala. Kobe scored 30, 32, 29, 40 in 2009, and scored 23, 26, 29, and 30 in 2010. If Gasol can get 20+ games in 2-3 games, he will really be able to win the FMV, but unfortunately he is not good at it and his performance is not as good as Iguodala.