Controversy! The official NBA explanation of why the Stepper General was expelled, but it proved that partiality and pursuit of dreams was as strong as a mountain

On May 12, a huge controversy broke out in the NBA official, publicly explaining why the Stepper General was expelled, but once again proved that he favored the Dream Green, and the evidence was as strong as a mountain.

Pacers not only led the Knights 3:1, but now they have the right time, place, and people in their own hands. However, a penalty from the referee in this game was very unfavorable to them. At his home court, Pacers' general Matherin was expelled from the game early, and he only played 1 minute and 20 seconds in this game.

This round was indeed a round that was a bit incomprehensible. In the first quarter of the game, Mathering and Hunter made an action when they were stuck. Mathering hit Hunter's chest. Hunter went up and pushed Mathering away. Turner stood up for his teammate Mathering and pushed Hunter away. The final result is that Matherin was expelled, and Hunter and Turner both received technical fouls, but is this action of Matherin really worthy of taking a second-level malicious foul and directly expelling?

Now the official explanation has finally come. The referee of this game, John Glober, responded positively in an interview with the on-site media, why did he give such a call at that time? His statement is as follows: "Mathering clenched his fist and hit Hunter's sternum. This behavior was unnecessary and an excessive physical contact action, so he called him a second-level malicious foul, not a first-level malicious foul, nor a skilled foul. In addition, Hunter and Turner, they deliberately pushed their opponents with both hands and deliberately bumped their opponents. Therefore, these two actions that violate sports ethics were added with technical fouls." This is the official explanation. It seems to make sense, but in fact it is not.

According to them, Mathering clenched his fist and gave Hunter the chest, which was unnecessary. It is explained to the second-level evil offender that the situation is serious, but the problem is that the Warriors' Dream Chasing Green hit Jaylen Green on the back of the head and even rode on the Rockets player Ethan's head. With this series of actions, why is he just a first-level malicious foul? Do you think it is dangerous to hit someone else's chest with a punch, or to hit someone else's head in the back, and to press the head with your legs?

If the official now believes that this action is a second-level malicious foul, it is the kind of action that must be expelled from the court immediately, then Zhu Meng Green was able to play the Rockets in a complete game at that time, which made people unable to understand. So the official now becomes more guilty and more distorted. The more you explain, the more you describe it, the more you become, the more you become, the more you say it is a bad move, but in other games, it is not so much for punishment.

The official explanation after the game can only cause greater controversy. Hitting someone else in the chest is excessive contact, so is it excessive contact with a punch in the head? This matter seems very nonsensical. Unless the official stands up and admits that the battle against the Blazing Fire was partial to the Meng Green, so he was not sent off. Otherwise, the reason for their expulsion of Mathering was untenable.