If the Warriors want to win the tiebreak, it will be useless to rely on Butler and Curry alone

Yesterday, in the NBA Western Conference Playoffs G6, the Warriors lost to the Rockets 107-115 at home. With the advantage of 3-1 with a big score, they lost two games in a row, and were dragged into the tiebreak battle by the Rockets. G6 and G5 are different. Curry and Butler scored 29 points and 27 points respectively. Under the Rockets' Iron Locks' joint defense, these two old men are desperate to perform like this.

But the problem is that the Warriors' Kuba has performed at the level, but is still suppressed by the Rockets. How can this G7 be broken, let alone Houston's home court? After the game, relevant personnel from the Warriors spoke as if they gave a common answer.

head coach Cole said: "G7 is considering changing the lineup, and Kumingga will likely return to the rotation lineup."

Curry said: "Whoever comes to this league has no skills, and if you have the chance, you will take decisive action (don't always look for me, I'm defended to death).

Butler even admitted: "Our team is too selfless, this is not a good thing."

Kuming added the game, and a player who was DNP three consecutive games? Don't expect Curry and Butler to throw it away if you have the chance?

Old Liu summarized the core tactics of the Warriors in the next game: "You can give up, but you can't beat them according to the conventional routine!"

Many Yongmi still firmly believe that the Warriors can win the G7, but the premise is that either Curry scored 50+ or ​​Butler scored 50+, which seems a bit difficult for these two older stars. The key breakthrough of

G7 depends on other players other than Warriors Kuba. At least two role players need to perform very long, such as Podjemsky and Kumingga. As for Hield, he can't count on it.