I led the team to the top, but the FMVP was taken away by my teammates? To count the five most controversial FMVPs in NBA history!

In NBA history, there are indeed some selections of most valuable players in the Finals, which makes fans angry and cause huge controversy. So what are the most controversial FMVPs in NBA history? Let me take a look at it based on my personal opinion.

1: In the 2015 Iguodala

2015 Finals, many fans think that FMVP should be given to Curry. Let's take a look at the average data of the two in the finals. Curry can average 26 points, 5.2 rebounds, and 6.3 assists per game, while Iguodala can average 16.3 points, 5.8 rebounds and 4 assists per game. Should I give Curry this data? But in the end, the judges believed that Iguodala had been very successful in defending James because Iguodala's defensive team won three games in a row. To be honest, Iguodala's defense did play a big role, but don't forget Curry's restraint. It is precisely because of Curry's restraint that Iguodala has more time to concentrate on defending James. It can be said that the FMVP in the 2015 Finals is the most ridiculous.

2: Pierce in 2008 should essentially give Garnett, but in the end he gave Paul Pierce. Let's first look at the average data of the two in the finals. Pierce averaged 21.8 points and 4.5 rebounds per game, while Garnett averaged 18.2 points and 13 rebounds per game. Pierce withdrew from injury in the first game and returned to the final quarter, conquered the judges and won the FMVP, but in the Celtics, Garnett is the real team's defensive core. Gasol played a key role in limiting the Lakers' shooting percentage, which only made Gasol's shooting percentage about 37%. It can be said that Garnett completely controlled the game.

3: Duncan in 2005

Originally, I thought there was no problem with this FMVP, but let me talk about it. The FMVP in the 2005 Finals was given to Duncan, but some fans thought it should be given to Gilo Billy. First, let's take a look at the average data of the two in the finals. Duncan averaged 20.6 points and 14.1 rebounds per game, while Gilo Billy averaged 18.7 points and 5.9 rebounds per game. In the first two finals, Gilo Billy scored 53 points by himself. With Gilo Billy's outstanding performance, he led 2-0. He also scored 7 in the finals and scored 9 points in a row. He had the highest efficiency value in the whole game. Although Duncan did a very good job on the offensive and defensive end, his shooting percentage was only 41%. It can be said that half of Duncan's FMVP was credited to Gilo Billy. As for whom I gave it to, I don't think it matters.

4: The FMVP of Parker in 2007 2007 Finals gave Parker, but many fans thought it should be given to Duncan. Let's take a look at the data averaged between the two in the finals. Parker averaged 24.5 points, 5 rebounds, and 0.1 blocks per game, while Duncan averaged 18.3 points, 11.5 rebounds, and 2.3 blocks per game. Parker mainly scored FMVP with offensive highlights, but Duncan played an axial role in defense, especially in limiting James, who made James' shooting percentage low to only 36%.

5: Johnson

The FMVP in the 1980 finals was given to Johnson, but there is also controversy to Jaycee. Let's take a look at the average data of the two in the finals. Jaycee is able to contribute 33.4 points, 13.6 rebounds, 3.2 assists per game, and Johnson is able to contribute 21.5 points, 11.2 rebounds, and 8.7 assists per game. In the first five games of the finals, Jabbar averaged 33 points and 14 rebounds per game, leading the Lakers to win 3 games. Jabbar missed the game due to injury in Game 6, and Johnson replaced the center position. Johnson scored 42 points, 15 rebounds and 7 assists dominant data. Finally, the FMVP was awarded to the Magic by his wonderful performance in Game 6, but to be honest, the FMVP should be given to Jabbar, after all, Jabbar is the master of the entire finals.

This article is original by the author, and plagiarism will be prosecuted!